ugliest_dogIn recent posts we have noted that the Living section of the Arizona Republic has published a lot of stories about dogs—more than you’d expect from a paper that doesn’t print enough news about people.

We finally came to conclusion that the section was being edited by a dog, and even found a picture of the editor in question, which you can see here.

Reading the Living section and keeping in mind that that’s the fellow in charge helps in understanding some of the editorial choices the paper makes on a given day.

The pieces were in most cases crappy little wire-service stories about pet-related products or ephemera.

There was the one about dogs on Facebook:

“Busy social network for the furry set.”

And one about dogs on Twitter:

“Dogs can tweet, too (sort of).”

There was a story about swanky places to board your dog:

“Posh pads for pampered pooches.”

And then, mind-blowingly, another story about swanky places to board your dog:

“Ritzy pet resorts replace kennels of yesterday.”

While examining some old files here at PHXated world headquarters we came across a torn-out front page of the Living section from February.

We realized that we’d missed some of the paper’s hard-hitting dog coverage.

We mention it now because it’s quite a story.

It’s about a church (in LA, not Phoenix, because this is just another space-filling wire story), that allows dogs.

This is how it begins, emphasis added:

As the Presbyterian service was about to start, one of the congregants was being disruptive, making a spectacle of himself once again on a Sunday. But that’s what other members of the Los Angeles church have come to expect from Mr. Booby.

At Covenant Presbyterian Church in the city’s Westchester neighborhood, dogs like Mr. Booby are welcome congregants at the Sunday night services, where howling and sudden bouts of scratching may interrupt prayers, and the collection plate holds treats for poodles and golden retrievers alike.

The hedline?

“Howl-lelujah: Church includes dogs”